With respect to financial issues related to divorce, marital agreements are regularly maintained and enforced by courts in virtually all states. There are circumstances in which the courts have refused to apply certain parts/provisions of these agreements. In North Dakota.B, divorce courts retain the jurisdiction to amend a limitation on the right to apply for spousal support or assistance in a pre-marital contract if this would result in the spouse who waived that right in need of public assistance at the time of the divorce.  Florida and several other states have similar restrictions to prevent an outgoing spouse from becoming a community of the state after divorce under a marital agreement.  In addition, in Florida, the Pre-Trial Contracts Act, where inheritance (electoral quota) and thought rights granted to surviving spouses under state law are so strong that a waiver of the rights of the surviving spouse, enshrined in a matrimonial agreement, is enforceable with the same formality as the will (notarially and notably). Boyd also says that people who have large debt disparities also tend to enter into these agreements. In 2015, the U.S. Supreme Court granted same-sex marriage the same legal basis as same-sex marriage, in the case of Obergefell v. Hodges (decided June 26, 2015). The consequence of the Supreme Court decision is that a pre-marriage contract entered into by a same-sex couple in one state is enforceable in the event of a divorce in another state.  A movement has recently emerged in some modern Orthodox circles, supporting an additional marital agreement.
This is a reaction to a growing number of cases where the husband refuses to grant a religious divorce. In such cases, local authorities are not in a position to intervene, both for the sake of separation of church and state and because some halachic problems would arise. This situation leaves the woman in a state of aginut where she cannot remarry. To remedy this situation, the movement promotes a marital agreement in which the couple agrees to file their divorce, should it occur, before a rabbinical court. What is a marital agreement? “The purpose of a marriage agreement is to determine in advance what happens in the unlikely and tragic event that the marriage collapses,” Boyd explains. The idea is that instead of leaving it until the date of separation, to find out what`s going on, you try to anticipate in advance. In some countries, including the United States, Belgium and the Netherlands, the matrimonial agreement provides not only for what happens in the event of a divorce, but also to protect certain properties during marriage, for example in the event of bankruptcy. Many countries, including Canada, France, Italy and Germany, have marital rules, in addition to or in some cases instead of marriage agreements. Upsides: “In big marital agreements, you want to help clarify in advance what will happen if things go south in a relationship,” boyd says. “Sometimes they talk about how the couple will conduct the wedding itself… But that doesn`t happen. So most of the time, it`s a question of whether the spouse`s help will be payable – and if so, how long and for how long – and what qualities they should keep and what things do.
They reached this agreement to avoid spending tens of thousands of dollars later on lawyers. The British Columbias Family Law Act came into force in 2013 and replaced the province`s old Family Relations Act. The new legislation focuses on concerns about common law relations, which have gained considerable popularity since the adoption of the Family Relations Act in 1979. In several European countries such as France, Belgium, the Netherlands, Germany, Poland, Switzerland, Sweden, Denmark, Norway and Finland, marriage agreements have long been considered valid.